One way is to understand the strategy, because it is a path that connects a point of departure, destination, and if the two points to reflect together.
As a strategy and then journey takes us to three simple questions to answer. The first of these questions is "Where are we?" The second: "How should we go" "Where we want to be in the future," And the third is.
However, what makes this strategy is difficult, the answers to these three simple questions is actually much harder than people think at first.
In answering the question "Where are we?" People can quickly become aware of the little they have on their organization, like many of their decisions and actions have on the myths of organizational reality, or how decisions actual and actions actually affect the performance of the organization's purpose and objectives used. However, with an accurate and realistic, if an organization largely determine where the land and whether to do so successfully.
Even when you answer the question "Where do we want to be in the future?" People find it hard to imagine how the future will be to develop and how their business can be affected by these changes. Alternatively, it can be difficult to agree on the importance of possible changes and their impact on the organization. In some situations, people may not even be willing to reveal their views on the future of a wider audience. However, faced with uncertainty as a single officer or member of a management team is essential for reasons of strategy.
In addition to answering the question "How can we get?" And especially because it difficult to answer two questions are involved, people can easily overwhelmed and can easily see the strategy as a misuse of their intellectual property daily priority rather than the success of their business. When this happens, people seem to go through the process, selecting all the boxes, without actually engaging in this exercise.
The result is more likely to be the same. People can easily choose to continue doing what they have always done, or just do what is not if it makes sense, as with any organization. When people do not respond or face a problem or simply choose to deny that the result is often called a strategy, "emu" following the observation that in the face of danger or emus, ostriches hide their heads in Choose describes the sand.
An alternative strategy is the "in-tray" usually with investment banks in search, "a team of union leadership in their organization with another organization, the acquisition of another entity or the sale of part performance of their organization to another organization bound to inspire., Variations on the strategy "plateau" of consultants to support a management team to outsource part of an organization's activities and cost savings " reengineering "in existing structures of the organization and the processes that have one or even a kind of benchmarking is to develop a strategy for the organization as a whole or only part of it.
Another alternative is the strategy of "copies" in which a management team in an organization is another organization that believes that successfully identify and try to imitate what he does. This exercise can be used internally or by external consultants and is very popular because they are considered less risky development and less expensive to a new area of opportunity.
But what these and similar approaches have in common, lack of internal commitment in the areas of strategy to provide that a persistent dependence on luck or someone else with good ideas for an effective strategy for the organization.
Unfortunately, while these approaches provide a sense of short-term success, are not the basis of sustained yield. Similarly, not only to ensure standardized processes for the development and implementation of the strategy is not sustainable performance.
The only guarantee of lasting performance comes from the ability to perceive and respond to opportunities and threats affecting the attractiveness or the relative value of what the organization offers its customers, employees and investors. Most importantly, this capability must be integrated within the organization as a continuous learning process.
Saturday, 15 October 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment